Thursday, August 15, 2013

La Semana en Tecnología: Las Super Redes Móviles en camino...: Tomado de Bloomberg BusinessWeek

Tecnología

The Mobile Super-Networks Are Coming
GigaOM

The Mobile Super-Networks Are Coming

By      August 13, 2013
 
Australia’s Telstra (TLS:AU) and its mobile network supplier Ericsson (ERIC) have completed a live network trial of a new LTE technology that essentially splices two entirely different parts of the electromagnetic spectrum together, creating a kind of super-connection to the mobile network.
 
Telstra isn’t the first to the use the technology, an LTE-Advanced technique called carrier aggregation. That honor goes to SK Telecom (SKM), which was able to boost its LTE network to 150 Mbps theoretical speeds in June by combining its 800 MHz and 1800 MHz spectrum, the same selection of airwaves held by European operators such as Everything Everywhere in the U.K. and in Germany, Deutsche Telekom (DTE:GR). South Korea’s LG U+ followed SK’s lead in July with its own souped-up LTE systems.

Telstra combined its 900 MHz and 1800 MHz airwaves over its commercial LTE systems in Queensland, though it didn’t give any details on the network speeds that resulted. The company did reveal that it would use carrier aggregation to splice more frequencies in different bands into its network until it reaches the 300 Mbps ceiling.
 
That’s a powerful network. To put it in perspective, it’s about four times as fast as anything we have today in the U.S., and it’s two or three times faster than networks in Europe or Canada.
 
But North America and the old world aren’t far behind. Verizon Wireless and T-Mobile (TMUS) will likely launch their first 150 Mbps networks in the coming months (though they’ll both be using contiguous spectrum). Over the next two to three years, all of the major U.S. operators will use carrier aggregation to duct tape disparate frequency holdings into powerful unified connections.

Though Europe is further behind North America and Asia when it comes getting LTE services out the door, it could catch up rather quickly in terms of technology, speed, and capacity. European operators hold big chunks of spectrum, often in swathes as large as 40 MHz. By aggregating two of those big bands together, European operators could get a lot more benefit out of these LTE-Advanced techniques than most.
 
As for the technology’s practical use, the obvious advantage is speed, though at a certain point there’s not much difference between a 15 Mbps connection and a 50 Mbps connection on a smartphone.

But as global operators progress through the LTE-Advanced standard, they will be able to deliver a lot more than just raw speed (SK Telecom has already started that journey). They’ll be able to provide more resilient links and more consistent connection speeds. The overall spectral efficiency of the network will increase as well, which hopefully translates into cheaper mobile data pricing.

Also from GigaOM

Explaining the Mobile Wane in Spain (subscription required)
5 Things Apple Should Copy From Samsung
Paying Attention? New Online Training Tech Keeps an Eye on Employees
Here’s a Secret 2012 Blackberry Takeover Plan That Never Happened
Here Are Some Hurdles the Hyperloop Could Face
Kevin covers mobile broadband, carriers and wireless infrastructure for GigaOM.
 












 

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Tecnología: El Hyperloop (Tomado de Bloomberg BusinessWeek)

Technology

Musk speaking at a news conference at the National Press Club in Washington

Musk speaking at a news conference at the National Press Club in Washington

Transportation

Revealed: Elon Musk Explains the Hyperloop, the Solar-Powered High-Speed Future of Inter-City Transportation

By   August 12, 2013
 
Almost a year after Elon Musk, chief executive of Tesla Motors (TSLA) and SpaceX, first floated the idea of a superfast mode of transportation, he has finally revealed the details: a solar-powered, city-to-city elevated transit system that could take passengers and cars from Los Angeles to San Francisco in 30 minutes. In typical Musk fashion, the Hyperloop, as he calls it, immediately poses a challenge to the status quo—in this case, California’s $70 billion high-speed train that has been knocked by Musk and others as too expensive, too slow, and too impractical.
 
In Musk’s vision, the Hyperloop would transport people via aluminum pods enclosed inside of steel tubes. He describes the design as looking like a shotgun with the tubes running side by side for most of the journey and closing the loop at either end. These tubes would be mounted on columns 50 to 100 yards apart, and the pods inside would travel up to 800 miles per hour. Some of this Musk has hinted at before; he now adds that pods could ferry cars as well as people. “You just drive on, and the pod departs,” Musk told Bloomberg Businessweek in his first interview about the Hyperloop.
 
An artist's impression of the Hyperloop podCourtesy Elon MuskAn artist's impression of the Hyperloop pod
Musk published a blog post detailing the Hyperloop on Monday. He also held a press call to go over the details.

STORY: Hyperloop Physics 101 With Elon Musk
Musk has built his entrepreneurial career attacking businesses he deems inefficient or uninspiring. He co-founded PayPal in a bid to shake up the banking industry, then used the fortune he made selling the startup to eBay (EBAY) to fund equally ambitious efforts in transportation. Tesla Motors, for example, has created the highest-performing, highest-rated all-electric car and a complementary network of charging stations scattered around North America. Meanwhile, SpaceX competes against entire nations in the market to send up satellites and resupply the International Space Station.
 
In the case of the Hyperloop, Musk started focusing on public transportation after he grew disenchanted with the plans for California’s high-speed rail system. Construction on the highly political, $70 billion project is meant to begin in earnest this year, with plans to link cities from San Diego to Sacramento by 2029. “You have to look at what they say it will cost vs. the actual final costs, and I think it’s safe to say you’re talking about a $100 billion-plus train,” Musk says, adding that the train is too slow and a horrendous land rights mess.
 
Musk thinks the Hyperloop would avoid many of the land issues because it’s elevated. The tubes would, for the most part, follow I-5, the dreary but direct freeway between L.A. and San Francisco. Farmers would not have swaths of their land blocked by train tracks but could instead access their land between the columns. Musk figures the Hyperloop could be built for $6 billion with people-only pods, or $10 billion for the larger pods capable of holding people and cars. All together, his alternative would be four times as fast as California’s proposed train, at one-10th the cost. Tickets, Musk says, would be “much cheaper” than a plane ride.
 
STORY: Elon Musk, the 21st Century Industrialist
As for safety? Musk has heard of it. “There’s an emergency brake,” he says. “Generally, though, the safe distance between the pods would be about 5 miles, so you could have about 70 pods between Los Angeles and San Francisco that leave every 30 seconds. It’s like getting a ride on Space Mountain at Disneyland.” Musk imagines that riding on the Hyperloop would be quite pleasant. “It would have less lateral acceleration—which is what tends to make people feel motion sick—than a subway ride, as the pod banks against the tube like an airplane,” he says. “Unlike an airplane, it is not subject to turbulence, so there are no sudden movements. It would feel supersmooth.”
The Hyperloop was designed to link cities less than 1,000 miles apart that have high amounts of traffic between them, Musk says. Under 1,000 miles, the Hyperloop could have a nice edge over planes, which need a lot of time to take off and land. “It makes sense for things like L.A. to San Francisco, New York to D.C., New York to Boston,” Musk says. “Over 1,000 miles, the tube cost starts to become prohibitive, and you don’t want tubes every which way. You don’t want to live in Tube Land.” Right?
VIDEO:
In the months since Musk first mentioned the Hyperloop, there has been plenty of speculation. Critics, dealing with limited information, have contended that the specifications laid out by Musk would be nearly impossible to achieve. Such a long, pressurized tube would require an immense amount of energy while also producing tons of air friction and heat.
 
Now Musk argues that the Hyperloop represents a type of middle ground that other people have yet to consider. Instead of being a complete vacuum or running at normal conditions, the Hyperloop tubes would be under low pressure. “I think a lot of people tended to gravitate to one idea or the other as opposed to thinking about lower pressure,” Musk says. “I have never seen that idea anywhere.”
 
Inside the tubes, the pods would be mounted on thin skis made out of inconel, a trusted alloy of SpaceX that can withstand high pressure and heat. Air gets pumped through little holes in the skis to make an air cushion, Musk says. The front of the pod would have a pair of air jet inlets—sort of like the Concorde. An electric turbo compressor would compress the air from the nose and route it to the skis and to the cabin. Magnets on the skis, plus an electromagnetic pulse, would give the pod its initial thrust; reboosting motors along the route would keep the pod moving. And: no sonic boom.
 
With warm air inside the tubes and high tailwinds, the pods could travel at high speeds without crossing the sound barrier. “The pod can go just below the speed of sound relative to the air,” Musk says.
 
STORY: Tesla Motors Stuns Wall Street ... Again
So, science, or science fiction? About a dozen people at Tesla and SpaceX have helped Musk with the design and checked the physics behind the Hyperloop. I briefed Martin Simon, a professor of physics at UCLA, on some of the Hyperloop details, and he declared it feasible from a technological standpoint: “It does sound like it’s all done with known technology. It’s not like he’s counting on something brand new to be invented.”
 
Simon points out that the acceleration methods proposed by Musk are used at amusement parks to get a roller coaster going. Other companies have looked at these techniques for passenger and freight vehicles. What sets the Hyperloop apart, though, is the use of the air cushion to levitate the pods. “He has separated the air cushion and the linear induction drive, and that seems new,” Simon says, adding, “It would be cool if they had transparent tubes.”
 
The critics of California’s high-speed rail may be dismayed to learn that Musk does not plan to commercialize the Hyperloop technology for the time being. He’s posting the plans and asking for feedback and contemplating building a prototype. “I’m just putting this out there as an open source design,” he says. “There are sure to be suggestions out there for making this better, correcting any mistakes, and refining the design.” Musk maintains that he has too much on his plate to deal with bringing the Hyperloop to fruition. “I wish I had not mentioned it,” he says. “I still have to run SpaceX and Tesla, and it’s fucking hard.”
 
VIDEO: Conard: Musk's Hyperloop Tempered By Technology
Musk says he would support another person or organization that wanted to make the Hyperloop a reality.
 
“It is a question of finding the right person and team to get behind it,” Musk says. “Creating a prototype is not that expensive.” But if no one advances or acts on Musk’s ideas, he may come back to the Hyperloop in a few years’ time and pursue it as part of Tesla. “Down the road, I might fund or advise on a Hyperloop project, but right now I can’t take my eye off the ball at either SpaceX or Tesla.”
 
STORY: With SolarCity IPO, Elon Musk May Get Clean Tech Right
 
In the months since Musk first mentioned the Hyperloop, there has been plenty of speculation. Critics, dealing with limited information, have contended that the specifications laid out by Musk would be nearly impossible to achieve. Such a long, pressurized tube would require an immense amount of energy while also producing tons of air friction and heat.
 
Now Musk argues that the Hyperloop represents a type of middle ground that other people have yet to consider. Instead of being a complete vacuum or running at normal conditions, the Hyperloop tubes would be under low pressure. “I think a lot of people tended to gravitate to one idea or the other as opposed to thinking about lower pressure,” Musk says. “I have never seen that idea anywhere.”
 
Inside the tubes, the pods would be mounted on thin skis made out of inconel, a trusted alloy of SpaceX that can withstand high pressure and heat. Air gets pumped through little holes in the skis to make an air cushion, Musk says. The front of the pod would have a pair of air jet inlets—sort of like the Concorde. An electric turbo compressor would compress the air from the nose and route it to the skis and to the cabin. Magnets on the skis, plus an electromagnetic pulse, would give the pod its initial thrust; reboosting motors along the route would keep the pod moving. And: no sonic boom.
 
With warm air inside the tubes and high tailwinds, the pods could travel at high speeds without crossing the sound barrier. “The pod can go just below the speed of sound relative to the air,” Musk says.
STORY: Tesla Motors Stuns Wall Street ... Again
So, science, or science fiction? About a dozen people at Tesla and SpaceX have helped Musk with the design and checked the physics behind the Hyperloop. I briefed Martin Simon, a professor of physics at UCLA, on some of the Hyperloop details, and he declared it feasible from a technological standpoint: “It does sound like it’s all done with known technology. It’s not like he’s counting on something brand new to be invented.”
 
Simon points out that the acceleration methods proposed by Musk are used at amusement parks to get a roller coaster going. Other companies have looked at these techniques for passenger and freight vehicles. What sets the Hyperloop apart, though, is the use of the air cushion to levitate the pods. “He has separated the air cushion and the linear induction drive, and that seems new,” Simon says, adding, “It would be cool if they had transparent tubes.”
 
The critics of California’s high-speed rail may be dismayed to learn that Musk does not plan to commercialize the Hyperloop technology for the time being. He’s posting the plans and asking for feedback and contemplating building a prototype. “I’m just putting this out there as an open source design,” he says. “There are sure to be suggestions out there for making this better, correcting any mistakes, and refining the design.” Musk maintains that he has too much on his plate to deal with bringing the Hyperloop to fruition. “I wish I had not mentioned it,” he says. “I still have to run SpaceX and Tesla, and it’s fucking hard.”
 
VIDEO: Conard: Musk's Hyperloop Tempered By Technology
Musk says he would support another person or organization that wanted to make the Hyperloop a reality.
 
“It is a question of finding the right person and team to get behind it,” Musk says. “Creating a prototype is not that expensive.” But if no one advances or acts on Musk’s ideas, he may come back to the Hyperloop in a few years’ time and pursue it as part of Tesla. “Down the road, I might fund or advise on a Hyperloop project, but right now I can’t take my eye off the ball at either SpaceX or Tesla.”
 
STORY: With SolarCity IPO, Elon Musk May Get Clean Tech Right
 

Monday, August 12, 2013

Tecnología, presión política y Leyes: El caso Snowden y sus consecuencias (Tomado de ZDNet on-line service)

Snowden's privacy-oriented email provider shuts down under U.S. government pressure

Summary: An American company that specialized in highly encrypted email suspended operations today. The abrupt shutdown of Lavabit, a small Texas-based company, is suspected to be related to a court order related to its best-known customer, NSA leaker Edward Snowden.
By for The Ed Bott Report |
An American company that specialized in private e-mail announced today that it is shutting down, effective immediately.
 
Normally, that wouldn’t be a big deal—after all, small tech companies fail all the time. But this company’s different. Lavabit,  which had been in operation since 2004, was outed last month as Edward Snowden’s email provider. And today the company’s owner and operator, Ladar Levison, announced that he was “walking away from nearly ten years of hard work” rather than “become complicit in crimes against the American people.”
 
Visitors to Lavabit’s website, including paying customers, now see this message:
 
What happened?
 
The details are cryptic, but here are a few essential facts.
 
On Friday, July 12, Edward Snowden, who had used his position as a trusted contractor at the NSA to steal thousands of classified documents, held a press conference at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport to complain about an “unlawful campaign” against him by the United States government. In a liveblog of the event, the Boston-based GlobalPost.com reported this crucial detail:
Sergei Nikitin, the head of Amnesty International’s Moscow office, and Vladimir Lukin, the Kremlin-appointed human rights ombudsman, are among those who confirmed to Russian news agencies that they would accept the invitation to Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, reportedly sent Thursday from an email address supposedly belonging to Snowden.
The note, which could not be verified, requested the attendance of a slew of well-known rights workers and lawyers “for a brief statement and discussion regarding the next steps forward in my situation,” according to a copy of the invitation posted Lokshina.
It was sent from the email address “edsnowden@lavabit.com,” according to Lokshina’s post, and signed “Edward Joseph Snowden.”
[emphasis added]
Before and after Edward Snowden engineered the NSA document heist, he had been in touch via e-mail with several journalists scattered around the world. As part of the communication process, Snowden insisted on encrypting his correspondence using PGP software. He also used Lavabit, which offered “Security Through Asymmetric Encryption” as a key part of its service. In a white paper explaining its technology, Lavabit said “Lavabit has developed a system so secure that it prevents everyone, including us, from reading the e-mail of the people that use it.” (The whitepaper is no longer available online, but a copy is still available in the Internet Archive.)
 
According to that whitepaper, here’s what happened to messages stored at Lavabit:
[I]ncoming e-mail messages are encrypted before they’re saved onto our servers. Once a message has been encrypted, only someone who has the account password can decrypt the message. Like all safety measures, encryption is only effective if it’s used. To ensure privacy, Lavabit has developed a complex system that makes the entire encryption and decryption process transparent to the end user.
[…]
We should note that this encryption process is only secure if you select a strong password. If your password is weak, an attacker would only need to brute force the password to crack our encryption. We should also note that this feature only protects messages on the Lavabit servers. Messages can always be intercepted before they reach Lavabit or between Lavabit’s servers and your personal computer, if SSL is not used. Finally, messages can be retrieved from your local hard drive if encryption software isn’t used on your computer to protect the files. These vulnerabilities are intentional. Our goal was to make invading a user’s privacy difficult, by protecting messages at their most vulnerable point. That doesn’t mean a dedicated attacker, like the United States government, couldn’t intercept the message in transit or once it reaches your computer.
And this section is inadvertently prescient:
Our hope is the difficulty associated with those strategies means they will only be used by governments on terrorists and scammers, not on honest citizens. If you’re intent on hiding your communications from the government, we recommend you investigate systems that secure messages throughout the entire e-mail system and not just at one particular point along that journey.
Levison’s note says, “I wish that I could legally share with you the events that led to my decision. I cannot.” That suggests he and his company were served with a warrant whose terms included a gag order prohibiting any disclosure of the order’s contents. That warrant could have been a National Security Letter, but it could just as easily have been a court order requiring the company to cooperate with an interception of Snowden’s correspondence as well as those of other Lavabit subscribers who might have been allegedly conspiring with Snowden.
 
The outrage over overly broad surveillance of U.S. citizens by the NSA doesn’t seem to apply here. Snowden freely admitted that he had broken the law in an act of civil disobedience. He has been indicted on three counts of espionage, theft, and conversion of government property. The criminal complaint was filed not in the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court but in the United States District Court in Virginia.
 
In a post on Google+, CNET’s Declan McCullagh speculated that Lavabit had been served with a court order to intercept passwords and possibly encryption keys, that they had fought the order for six weeks and lost, and had shut down the service rather than comply.
 
That’s certainly a reasonable scenario, but those who know the details aren’t talking.
 
In a closing note, Levison offered a warning about anyone doing business with U.S. tech companies:
This experience has taught me one very important lesson: without congressional action or a strong judicial precedent, I would _strongly_ recommend against anyone trusting their private data to a company with physical ties to the United States.
So far, no other U.S. companies have reported similar orders.

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Why is Jeff Bezos Buying the Washington Post? (From Bloomberg BusinessWeek)

Companies & Industries

Why Is Jeff Bezos Buying the Washington Post?
Media By   August 06, 2013

A day after the Graham family’s stunning announcement that it is selling the Washington Post to Jeff Bezos, the big question remains: Why is Amazon’s (AMZN) founder betting on old media? Here’s one answer: Jeff Bezos loves content, and he always has.

This hasn’t always been obvious. Amazon’s most visible accomplishments include its massive fulfillment network, so adept at efficiently moving warehouses to doorsteps; its domination of the e-books universe, from the Kindle to the world of content created for it; and its management of massive amounts of customer data in order to coldly personalize Amazon’s site for each of its 200 million customers.

Still, Bezos has always loved a good story—the kind that engrosses customers and encourages them to spend time with electronic devices and to purchase books, music, and movies (which still account for a good chunk of Amazon’s business). In the 1990s, when his ambition was to create the largest bookstore on the Web, Bezos built a large editorial department, hiring a staff to turn Amazon into the equivalent of a massive book chain with the trusted touch of an indie bookstore. Now it seems almost quaint, but Bezos had big dreams for the group; he tried to hire esteemed journalists such as then-Time editor Walter Isaacson. As I recount in my forthcoming book The Everything Store, the editorial department eventually faded during the dot.com bust amid a direct, acrimonious, internal competition with the algorithms that could more efficiently personalize the website.

Bezos didn’t give up his dream of owning and delivering unique content. With the rise of the Kindle in 2009, he began to create a wide array of publishing imprints that encouraged authors to experiment and sell their wares directly to readers. This is often framed as a competitive attack on traditional publishing—including by us—but programs such as Kindle Singles and Kindle Serials have given writers new way to reach an audience. Departments like Amazon Studios, which is backing television shows, are giving creators freedom and flexibility outside the realm of major television distributors.

There are strong personal reasons for Bezos to invest in content. His wife, MacKenzie Bezos, is a novelist. He is also a voracious reader: Bezos has credited books with informing many of his most important business decisions, from the creation of the Kindle and Amazon Web Services to his deliberate cultivation of a frugal, action-oriented culture at Amazon.

There’s one other obvious factor at work in Bezos’s purchase of the Post. Warren Buffett, whose investment philosophy has clearly inspired Bezos’s long-term emphasis at Amazon, has recently bet big on the revival of local journalism. To Buffett, local papers are a great investment: they have strong-bonds with their community, a minimum of established competition, and staffs full of ambitious, versatile journalists. “Wherever there is a pervasive sense of community, a paper that serves the special informational needs of that community will remain indispensable to a significant portion of its residents,” Buffett wrote. “Charlie [Munger] and I believe that papers delivering comprehensive and reliable information to tightly-bound communities and having a sensible internet strategy will remain viable for a long time.”

With programs such as Amazon Web Services and Kindle Publishing, Bezos has given developers and authors platforms on which to experiment and reap outsized rewards. Both programs have enjoyed outsized success. By buying the Washington Post, Bezos can now extend those kinds of opportunities to journalists.
Bezos says he will operate the Post independently from Amazon. But as Henry Blodget observed, there are plenty of ways the newspaper fits neatly into Amazon’s digital ecosystem. So consider the Post another piece in Bezos’s own emerging narrative: how one long-underestimated man is assembling one of the largest networks of devices, applications, and content that the technology world has ever seen, piece by piece, right before our very eyes.

Stone is a senior writer for Bloomberg Businessweek in San Francisco. Follow him on Twitter @BradStone

Smartphones powered by the Light---Tomado de TechRepublic

Solar-powered smartphones are coming closer, with tests in China

Summary: Smartphones should soon be able to charge themselves using transparent Wysips Crystal photovoltaic panels bonded into their screens. And if the idea takes off, tablets and eventually whole buildings could follow....
Wysips_integration2c (200 x 174)
Wysips integration. Photo credit: Sunpartner
TCL Communication, a Chinese mobile phone manufacturer, is developing smartphones that recharge themselves using solar power. A phone is rather small for a solar panel, but it's using transparent Wysips Crystal technology that is bonded to the smartphone screen.
 
Wysips Crystal -- which stands for What You See Is Photovoltaic Surface -- has been developed by Sunpartner, which is based in the south of France. Sunpartner says: "The goal of this partnership is to develop smartphone prototypes powered by solar and artificial light. This project will enable TCL Communication to evaluate the technology in both technical and marketing terms."
 
TCL also has a French connection, in that it supplies Alcatel with its OneTouch mobile phone. It markets phones in more than 120 countries.
 
The companies expect that putting an ultra-thin layer of Wysips Crystal under the screen will enable a smartphone to generate enough power to maintain a charge. It hopes an hour of sunlight will provide enough power for 30minutes of conversation.

Duke Kills Florida Nuclear Project, Keeps Customers' Money(from Bloomberg BusinessWeek)

Politics & Policy
Georgia Power's Vogtle 3 and 4 plant construction site

Georgia Power's Vogtle 3 and 4 plant construction site

Nuke Fallout


By

The decision by Duke Energy (DUK) to scuttle a proposed nuclear reactor project in central Florida leaves utility customers in the state with a tab of more than $1 billion—most of it already paid to Duke—for unbuilt plants that may never produce a single kilowatt of energy. That’s proved a powerful irritant for customers in the Sunshine State, where air conditioning is a necessity for much of the year.
 
The company said Thursday that it will halt construction on two reactors planned for Levy County, north of Tampa, after their estimated date of completion had stretched into 2024 at a projected cost of some $24 billion. Duke inherited the project as part of its purchase of Progress Energy last year, which made it the nation’s largest power utility. Duke’s decision also calls into question whether another large utility in the state, Florida Power and Light (NEE), will proceed with two new reactors it plans near Homestead, south of Miami.
 
“Consumers should rejoice that the fleecing will end by one of the companies in this long and unfortunate chapter in Florida energy history, where utilities have conspired with legislators and the Public Service Commission to take advantage of Florida consumers,” said Stephen Smith, executive director of Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, an organization that has criticized plans for nuclear power plants in several states. The group held a conference call Friday to discuss the project’s end. “The bad news about all of this is clearly that consumers have paid literally billions of dollars for a facility that they are going to get no value from.”
 
The primary reason for those huge sums? Lawmakers in at least three states have allowed utilities to recoup their engineering and planning costs from customers years before any construction begins on new plants. Florida legislators passed the first such law in 2006, followed by Georgia and South Carolina. A lawsuit over the Florida measure went to the state Supreme Court, which ruled it constitutional. Multiple efforts to repeal the law have failed.
 
Duke has collected $819.5 million in Florida since 2009 for the Levy County project and work at a separate planned nuclear site, according to the Florida Public Service Commission. Under a settlement with the state, Duke plans to collect another $350 million in costs from Florida customers over 20 years starting in 2017. Cindy Muir, a spokeswoman for the Florida Public Service Commission, which regulates utilities operating in the state, said commissioners “followed the laws as directed by the Legislature” when approving funds for the Duke projects.
 
Southern Co.’s (SO) Georgia Power unit is building two new reactors in eastern Georgia, while Scana (SCG) is building two reactors at a site in Fairfield County, north of Columbia, S.C. Both projects have been funded with so-called advance cost recovery money charged to utility customers.
 
“The insanity of advance cost recovery has been revealed in Florida—it’s the ‘emperor has no clothes’ time,” says Mark Cooper, a senior fellow for economic analysis at Vermont Law School, who works with the Southern Alliance. “The notion that utilities are going to try to go forward without having a great deal of risk [on shareholders] has suffered a major blow here.” The alliance, based in Knoxville, Tenn., also argued that Florida’s Legislature, the PSC, and the Florida Office of Public Counsel, which advocates for consumers before the PSC, had failed state residents when it comes to nuclear plants.
 
“Whether I think it’s a good law or a bad law is irrelevant, I don’t have any say-so in that,” responded J.R. Kelly, an attorney who serves as Florida’s Public Counsel. His office is not empowered to lobby state legislators, he said.
 
In canceling the Levy County reactors, Charlotte-based Duke said its decision was prudent given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Agency would be unable to approve a construction and operating license for the project before January, which would mean the plant would not begin operating before 2024. Duke plans to pursue the license and expects to receive it in 2016, spokesman Rick Rhodes said today. The company considers the project to be merely delayed, he added, with future construction there remaining likely. “Our philosophy at Duke is that you need a diversity of different types of fuel,” Rhodes said. “I think as a utility, and as a country, we have to have nuclear in our future.”
 
Some observers remain skeptical of the company. “I can’t believe there’s not a good law firm somewhere in these great United States looking at this and saying is there a possibility of a class-action lawsuit” for consumers, said Florida Representative Mike Fasano, a Republican from New Port Richey who has testified against advance cost recovery laws in other states. He alleged that Duke never intended to build nuclear plants in Florida and lied to lawmakers about its plans.
 
The Duke project’s demise—for the near future, at least—is a further nail in the coffin of the U.S.’s so-called nuclear renaissance, an effort begun during the George W. Bush administration to revive the nation’s nuclear power industry through streamlined regulatory approvals and federal loan guarantees and subsidies. Rival utilities NRG Energy (NRG) and Exelon (EXC) have also shelved plans for nuclear reactors over the past four years.
 
Most of that reversal can be traced to the plummeting price of natural gas, which now trades around $3.35 per million British thermal units. Utilities, which account for about one-third of all U.S. natural gas use, have migrated to the cheap gas to fuel electricity production. Five years ago, when development on several of the Southeastern nuclear projects commenced, gas traded above $13. Its plunge has helped to wreck the feasibility of many planned nuclear plants.
 
Bachman is an associate editor for Businessweek.com.
 

Friday, August 2, 2013

Number of college grads with IT degrees downm(Tomado de TechRepublic)

Number of college grads with IT degrees down

A CareerBuillder study shows that colleges are issuing fewer IT degrees than ten years ago. Here are the stats and a possible reason why.  
                   
I’ve been writing about IT careers for a long time. I’ve gotten thousands of PR releases about new studies. Many of these “studies” make me scratch my head and wonder why they were conducted and why anyone thought the results were newsworthy.  
 
But I got one the other day from CareerBuilder and Economic Modeling Specialists (EMSI) that got  my attention. According to this study, the U.S. is producing fewer college graduates with computer and Information Technology degrees than they were ten years ago. (The study uses EMSI’s labor market and education database, which pulls from over 90 national and state employment resources and includes detailed information on employees and self-employed workers. Higher education completion data includes associate’s degrees and above and comes from the National Center for Education Statistics.)
 
Ironically, the number of computer and IT jobs grew 13 percent nationally from 2003 to 2012, while the number of computer and IT degrees completed in the U.S. declined 11 percent during that same period. Here are the IT stats from the survey:
  • 13,576 fewer degrees in 2012 than 2003, an 11 percent decrease
  • Related jobs in the U.S. have increased 13.1 percent from 2003-2012, an addition of 311,068 jobs.
  • Of the 15 metros with the most computer and IT degrees in 2012, 10 saw decreases from their 2003 totals.
  • The biggest decreases in computer and IT graduates among the largest metros included New York City (a 52 percent drop), San Francisco (55 percent), Atlanta (33 percent), Miami (32 percent), and Los Angeles (31 percent).
  • Notable metros to increase their computer and IT higher education output were Washington, D.C. (a 31 percent rise), Minneapolis-St. Paul (14 percent), and Salt Lake City (117 percent).
So what’s going on? Part of this sea change is that people are starting to see that, with technology’s speed of change, the curriculum for a computer science degree gets obsolete about a month after it’s created.

Also, people are finding that it’s faster, and more cutting-edge, to pursue tech certifications after you’ve gotten your degree in any other discipline. There are no college prerequisites for getting a tech cert, and you can pursue them at any points in your career.

The stat that made my eyes pop out of my head was that there’s been a 47 percent increase (from 2003 to 2012) in Liberal Arts and Humanities degrees. Back when I was considering a degree (me and Fred Flintstone), a Liberal Arts degree was pretty much a guarantee that you would never get meaningful employment. And, of course, Humanities was where my heart was.

I forged on with my English degree, despite all the warnings of unemployment and inevitable starvation. When in school, I worked part-time at the law school and one of the professors told me I should attend law school because my ability to write would serve me better than a pre-law degree. I thought he was full of it.

Now that I’ve been in working world for several centuries, I can see his point. I think the most valuable employees are not those who come in with a deep knowledge of a specific area, but those who can learn almost anything once they’re in and can quickly adapt to change. And now that IT is more closely tied to the business, the ability to communicate effectively and see the big picture is more important than ever.

I think people are seeing that the more important takeaway from college is learning to think more strategically. I’d like to hear from those of you from both sides of the equation? If you have a computer science degree, do you think it’s given you a leg up in your career? And for those who come into IT with out-of-the-norm degrees, do you feel that your lack of an IT degree has hindered you?